Judicial Independence Doesnt Always Mean Ruling Against The Government Dy Chandrachud

The latest and trending news from around the world.

ನ್ಯಾಯಾಂಗದ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯವೆಂದರೆ ಯಾವಾಗಲೂ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡುವುದಲ್ಲ: ಡಿವೈ ಚಂದ್ರಚೂಡ್
ನ್ಯಾಯಾಂಗದ ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯವೆಂದರೆ ಯಾವಾಗಲೂ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡುವುದಲ್ಲ: ಡಿವೈ ಚಂದ್ರಚೂಡ್ from

Judicial Independence Doesn't Always Mean Ruling Against the Government: D.Y. Chandrachud

Supreme Court judge D.Y. Chandrachud's recent speech has sparked a debate on the role of the judiciary in a democracy.

Chandrachud argued that judicial independence is not about always ruling against the government, but about ensuring that the government acts within the bounds of the law.

In a speech delivered at the launch of a book on judicial independence, Justice Chandrachud said that the judiciary's role is not to be a "rubber stamp" for the government, but to ensure that the government acts within the bounds of the law.

He said that the judiciary should not be seen as an "adversary" of the government, but as a partner in ensuring that the government acts in the best interests of the people.

Chandrachud's speech has been welcomed by some legal experts, who say that it is a much-needed reminder of the importance of judicial independence.

However, others have criticized Chandrachud's speech, saying that it is too soft on the government and that the judiciary should be more willing to stand up to the government.

The debate over Chandrachud's speech is likely to continue in the coming weeks and months, as the judiciary faces increasing pressure from the government.

Key Takeaways from Justice Chandrachud's Speech

Conclusion

Justice Chandrachud's speech is a timely reminder of the importance of judicial independence. In a democracy, the judiciary is the guarantor of the rights and freedoms of the people. It is essential that the judiciary be independent of the government and that it be able to make decisions without fear or favor.