Aligarh Muslim University Loses Its Minority Status Supreme Courts Landmark Ruling

The latest and trending news from around the world.

Aligarh Muslim Unversity: అలీగఢ్‌ యూనివర్సిటీకి మైనార్టీ హోదాపై.. సుప్రీం కీలక తీర్పు
Aligarh Muslim Unversity: అలీగఢ్‌ యూనివర్సిటీకి మైనార్టీ హోదాపై.. సుప్రీం కీలక తీర్పు from

Aligarh Muslim University Loses Its Minority Status: Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling

Background

The Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) was established in 1920 as a private institution by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. It was declared a central university by an Act of Parliament in 1951 and given minority status under Section 2(f) of the AMU Act, 1951.

The minority status allowed AMU to reserve 50% of its seats for Muslim students and appoint teachers from the Muslim community.

Supreme Court Ruling

On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the AMU is not a minority institution and cannot claim minority status under the Constitution.

The court held that the AMU is a secular institution open to students of all religions and communities and that the reservation of seats for Muslim students violated the principle of equality enshrined in the Constitution.

Significance of the Ruling

The Supreme Court's ruling has far-reaching implications for AMU and other minority institutions in India.

It means that AMU can no longer reserve seats for Muslim students or appoint teachers based on their religion.

The ruling also raises questions about the future of other minority institutions in India, such as the Jamia Millia Islamia and the Banaras Hindu University.

Reaction to the Ruling

The Supreme Court's ruling has been met with mixed reactions.

Some have welcomed the ruling, arguing that it will promote equality and inclusivity in AMU.

Others have criticized the ruling, saying that it will harm the interests of Muslim students and undermine the unique character of AMU.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's ruling on the minority status of AMU is a landmark decision that will have a significant impact on the university and on minority institutions in India.

The ruling raises important questions about the nature of minority rights and the role of religion in education.